Do you guys think that the law should also set a maximum liability for the tenant in case the contract is broken (i mean in the case when not RP is not cancelled). I am for it. Would like to hear your opinion.
Considering that landlord also needs some protection. My question here is about introducing a maximum liability on the tenant. 1 month or 2 month notice sounds very fair, but apparently it is not standard in all contracts these days. That's why i am suggesting that the law should prescribe this as well.
thanks
------------------------------------------
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
Do you guys think that the law should also set a maximum liability for the tenant in case the contract is broken (i mean in the case when not RP is not cancelled). I am for it. Would like to hear your opinion.
Considering that landlord also needs some protection. My question here is about introducing a maximum liability on the tenant. 1 month or 2 month notice sounds very fair, but apparently it is not standard in all contracts these days. That's why i am suggesting that the law should prescribe this as well.
thanks
------------------------------------------
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.