Most international sites are blocking websites promoted by alleged spam, due to complaints of some of it's members is very risky in my opinion. It is this sort of sensorhip that borders on constitutional infringement.
This one size fits all mentality will never work. I think it would be more appropriate for us to allow it's members to TURN ON or TURN OFF this blocking scheme. The admin have the technology to do it, but why make it system wide?
It should be the USERS choice. Why would I want to let some other person decide what sites or topics I would or would not like to see? If I like vitamins, and they don't, why should they get to have a say so? Ok that is the problem with this approach.
Most international sites are blocking websites promoted by alleged spam, due to complaints of some of it's members is very risky in my opinion. It is this sort of sensorhip that borders on constitutional infringement.
This one size fits all mentality will never work. I think it would be more appropriate for us to allow it's members to TURN ON or TURN OFF this blocking scheme. The admin have the technology to do it, but why make it system wide?
It should be the USERS choice. Why would I want to let some other person decide what sites or topics I would or would not like to see? If I like vitamins, and they don't, why should they get to have a say so? Ok that is the problem with this approach.