you mean to say that you generally want to ignore what happened and you want to take away my freedom of speech. What is wrong is wrong whether you understand and admit it or not, I will call it your ignorance.
Besides it is not an American hate speech. it is the chain of events which took place leading Americans to be disrespectful to the people in general. Now whether or not you agree, the scan process is distressful a disrespectful.
As for as this blog is considered, I will advise you to read "Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)" and about diplomatic rights.
The people who were asked to be scanned were on a diplomatic mission and could not be checked, stopped or scanned. Which means that the terms of the above Convention has been violated.
Even other wise We have the Right to criticize such laws in which you are considered guilty till proven innocent. In the process of scanning you are really considered guilty till proven innocence. History will always criticize such laws whether this principal is used in the anti terror laws, the current scanning process, Nuremberg trial, Group of Four in China, or the trial of Jesus Christ.
Further the most effected people from such scanning process and other related things are either Arabs, Afghans, Pakistanis and other Muslims. For this sole reason We have all the right to abject on it without exception.
you mean to say that you generally want to ignore what happened and you want to take away my freedom of speech. What is wrong is wrong whether you understand and admit it or not, I will call it your ignorance.
Besides it is not an American hate speech. it is the chain of events which took place leading Americans to be disrespectful to the people in general. Now whether or not you agree, the scan process is distressful a disrespectful.
As for as this blog is considered, I will advise you to read "Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)" and about diplomatic rights.
The people who were asked to be scanned were on a diplomatic mission and could not be checked, stopped or scanned. Which means that the terms of the above Convention has been violated.
Even other wise We have the Right to criticize such laws in which you are considered guilty till proven innocent. In the process of scanning you are really considered guilty till proven innocence. History will always criticize such laws whether this principal is used in the anti terror laws, the current scanning process, Nuremberg trial, Group of Four in China, or the trial of Jesus Christ.
Further the most effected people from such scanning process and other related things are either Arabs, Afghans, Pakistanis and other Muslims. For this sole reason We have all the right to abject on it without exception.