The dude I never said it is natural, rather i am trying to prove the fallacy of the those people who try to justify homosexuality because it is prevalent in animals.
At the same time I am amazed by the fact that the same people are staunch opponents of polygamy, even when the argument they use to justify homosexuality can be equally used to justify polygamy.
This may not be true to everyone though.
the argument that in polygamy people(women) are exploited is again contrary to the first argument, but if it is natural to animals then it is natural there is no exploitation.
I dont disagree that some people may exploit in a polygamous marrige, but this is the whole point that I am trying to make that 'just because it is natural to animals it should be ok for us , is a fallacy'
The dude I never said it is natural, rather i am trying to prove the fallacy of the those people who try to justify homosexuality because it is prevalent in animals.
At the same time I am amazed by the fact that the same people are staunch opponents of polygamy, even when the argument they use to justify homosexuality can be equally used to justify polygamy.
This may not be true to everyone though.
the argument that in polygamy people(women) are exploited is again contrary to the first argument, but if it is natural to animals then it is natural there is no exploitation.
I dont disagree that some people may exploit in a polygamous marrige, but this is the whole point that I am trying to make that 'just because it is natural to animals it should be ok for us , is a fallacy'