The problem with science is its systematic nature. You may be aware of the some mathematics givens, which cannot be proven but are to be accepted. is not this something scientists do! indeed.
Science also is based on observation. detecting a phenomenon and decomposing it which is effective but not all the time.
Additionally, why would we think and limit ourselves to science believing it has the answer. This may be our problem.
As I said earlier, we need to be careful on what tools to use, where to apply them and how.
How would you solve an equation with two or three unknowns. This is impossible!
However, the impossible becomes possible using the simultaneous approach not the conventional one.
I am assuming you have some mathematics background.
should not we use the known to define the unknown? maybe we need to.
we can debate for a long time with details on religion and evolution but i don't think it is the right approach here unless we are driven to it.
I may have confused you by now but i hope that made sense. I am just thinking out loud here and may be a good thing to point the thinking in a certain direction.
Let me ask you the following assuming you know enough about the 3 religions (Judaism, Christianity & Islam):
what would you attribute the similarity of the 3 religions to?
Adey...welcome back!
The problem with science is its systematic nature. You may be aware of the some mathematics givens, which cannot be proven but are to be accepted. is not this something scientists do! indeed.
Science also is based on observation. detecting a phenomenon and decomposing it which is effective but not all the time.
Additionally, why would we think and limit ourselves to science believing it has the answer. This may be our problem.
As I said earlier, we need to be careful on what tools to use, where to apply them and how.
How would you solve an equation with two or three unknowns. This is impossible!
However, the impossible becomes possible using the simultaneous approach not the conventional one.
I am assuming you have some mathematics background.
should not we use the known to define the unknown? maybe we need to.
we can debate for a long time with details on religion and evolution but i don't think it is the right approach here unless we are driven to it.
I may have confused you by now but i hope that made sense. I am just thinking out loud here and may be a good thing to point the thinking in a certain direction.
Let me ask you the following assuming you know enough about the 3 religions (Judaism, Christianity & Islam):
what would you attribute the similarity of the 3 religions to?