I disagree with most of the comments, the policy of the supermarkets/shops should be to pay what is broken by the customer :
- many times the products are not well arranged on the shop and do not need a lot of help to fall down and broke. You never picked up something and you saw an object falling down at the other side of the shelf??
- the cost for the shop for broken items is very small (do not forget that the price of the item as indicated in the shop is often 2 to 3 times the cost of the item for the shop) in comparison with what they can earn with a good customer relation.
Plus I do not really like all the comments on this mother ability to handle her kids. We do not know the circumstances and who are we to judge?
I disagree with most of the comments, the policy of the supermarkets/shops should be to pay what is broken by the customer :
- many times the products are not well arranged on the shop and do not need a lot of help to fall down and broke. You never picked up something and you saw an object falling down at the other side of the shelf??
- the cost for the shop for broken items is very small (do not forget that the price of the item as indicated in the shop is often 2 to 3 times the cost of the item for the shop) in comparison with what they can earn with a good customer relation.
Plus I do not really like all the comments on this mother ability to handle her kids. We do not know the circumstances and who are we to judge?