fubar, with all due respect to you, you are only reading what you want to read. The report is clear, but your conclusions are false.
Take this from here (page 6) of the summary of the report: http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2012_summary_booklet_final.pdf
"if everyone lived like an average resident of the USA, a total of four Earths would be required to regenerate humanity’s annual demand on nature"
They did not say Qatar, the number 1, why?
Also, page 8 pf the same, notice the color code of the graphs on page 7, the major portion of Qatar's foot print which made it no 1 is CARBON.
fubar, with all due respect to you, you are only reading what you want to read. The report is clear, but your conclusions are false.
Take this from here (page 6) of the summary of the report:
http://awsassets.panda.org/downloads/lpr_2012_summary_booklet_final.pdf
"if everyone lived like an average resident of the USA, a total of four Earths would be required to regenerate humanity’s annual demand on nature"
They did not say Qatar, the number 1, why?
Also, page 8 pf the same, notice the color code of the graphs on page 7, the major portion of Qatar's foot print which made it no 1 is CARBON.