I have no problem with the dominant culture requiring that minorities not offend local sensibilities--no veils in France, no headscarves in Turkish universities, no pork in Israeli supermarkets, no crucifixes in German state schools, no more human sacrifices in Mexico, no veils in Syrian state buildings, no new minarets in Switzerland, no crucifixes on Christian churches in Qatar. These are all nations whose constitutions embrace international standards of human rights, including freedom from oppression for religious beliefs (article 35 of the Qatari constitution, first amendment of the US constitution, etc. etc.). Yet each country rightly restricts some outward religious/cultural expressions by minority groups in accordance with national customs and cultures. Nothing wrong with that.
I have no problem with the dominant culture requiring that minorities not offend local sensibilities--no veils in France, no headscarves in Turkish universities, no pork in Israeli supermarkets, no crucifixes in German state schools, no more human sacrifices in Mexico, no veils in Syrian state buildings, no new minarets in Switzerland, no crucifixes on Christian churches in Qatar. These are all nations whose constitutions embrace international standards of human rights, including freedom from oppression for religious beliefs (article 35 of the Qatari constitution, first amendment of the US constitution, etc. etc.). Yet each country rightly restricts some outward religious/cultural expressions by minority groups in accordance with national customs and cultures. Nothing wrong with that.
It is you who has the double standard.