Unlike Australia and the U.K., where IVF is very sensibly regulated, the U.S. puts no such restrictions on doctors. The result is "litters" to which this nitwit gave birth.
I do hope that the U.S. bioethicists (sp?) push for a limit of embryos that can be put into the womb in one go. It's simply not fair for the babies, the taxpayers. . .or, for that matter, to the parents who are told that putting in that many embryos "increases the chance of getting pregnant".
It's not against the regulations in the U.S.
Unlike Australia and the U.K., where IVF is very sensibly regulated, the U.S. puts no such restrictions on doctors. The result is "litters" to which this nitwit gave birth.
I do hope that the U.S. bioethicists (sp?) push for a limit of embryos that can be put into the womb in one go. It's simply not fair for the babies, the taxpayers. . .or, for that matter, to the parents who are told that putting in that many embryos "increases the chance of getting pregnant".