I must admit it wasn't until recently that I realised that anyone can add and/or edit entries in Wikipedia. Not sure I've entirely trusted it's content since!
Although, when I looked at an entry about George W Bush there was a note at the top that the text could NOT be edited. I guess the above article from The Times says that it COULD be edited, but not by the likes of you and me!
It also begs the question 'what other information on the internet, which we consider to be factual, is being edited'? I guess most anything can be hacked into by the Big Brothers of this world ...
I must admit it wasn't until recently that I realised that anyone can add and/or edit entries in Wikipedia. Not sure I've entirely trusted it's content since!
Although, when I looked at an entry about George W Bush there was a note at the top that the text could NOT be edited. I guess the above article from The Times says that it COULD be edited, but not by the likes of you and me!
It also begs the question 'what other information on the internet, which we consider to be factual, is being edited'? I guess most anything can be hacked into by the Big Brothers of this world ...