(and, anyway, only really relevant to a few posts made a while back, now!)
How come my post on page 1, where I specifically pointed out that mir had edited his post, was completely overlooked!
Mir's post originally made accusations about Westerners, calling them 'faithless' amongst other things but, as can happen in this forum, he was editing his words while Gypsy was at the same time typing and posting her response and consequently her reply to him made it look like she was accusing him of something he hadn't said!
It's not unusual for this to happen if someone changes their mind about their post whilst an answer is being prepared, but in a thread like this it was unfortunate, to say the least.
I particularly made mention of this at the time so as to avoid a misrepresentation of Gypsy's comment.
I guess some preferred to ignore the facts - Plus que ca change .....
(and, anyway, only really relevant to a few posts made a while back, now!)
How come my post on page 1, where I specifically pointed out that mir had edited his post, was completely overlooked!
Mir's post originally made accusations about Westerners, calling them 'faithless' amongst other things but, as can happen in this forum, he was editing his words while Gypsy was at the same time typing and posting her response and consequently her reply to him made it look like she was accusing him of something he hadn't said!
It's not unusual for this to happen if someone changes their mind about their post whilst an answer is being prepared, but in a thread like this it was unfortunate, to say the least.
I particularly made mention of this at the time so as to avoid a misrepresentation of Gypsy's comment.
I guess some preferred to ignore the facts - Plus que ca change .....