i wasnt avoiding a question, in fact you didnt ask one. you put forward an opinion which you expect a rebuttal for.
in fact, your statement concerning a committee writing the koran hundreds of years later is incorrect. What you are in fact referring to is the collation of hundreds of individual written texts . This collation was done by the caliph uthman in 653AD, 21 after muhammads death.
Now, whether one believes that this collation was executed in a manner that preserved the integrity of the original message is entirely upto the individual.
I, like you super, dont take things at face value. The concept of the trinity is something i have never been able to grasp.
I am just trying to illustrate (a point that you have made previously) that regardless of the religion, followers will follow blindly without desire to form individual opinions based on the available evidence.
i wasnt avoiding a question, in fact you didnt ask one. you put forward an opinion which you expect a rebuttal for.
in fact, your statement concerning a committee writing the koran hundreds of years later is incorrect. What you are in fact referring to is the collation of hundreds of individual written texts . This collation was done by the caliph uthman in 653AD, 21 after muhammads death.
Now, whether one believes that this collation was executed in a manner that preserved the integrity of the original message is entirely upto the individual.
I, like you super, dont take things at face value. The concept of the trinity is something i have never been able to grasp.
I am just trying to illustrate (a point that you have made previously) that regardless of the religion, followers will follow blindly without desire to form individual opinions based on the available evidence.