I know "natural" and "acceptable" are different. My views on it being natural was in response to the views that it was . Existence in the animal kingdom is not a premise for "natural". Its the gay community thats using this argument. The gay community over the years has failed to prove that 1) it is innate or genetic and 2) it is irreversible so they have pulled out the "it happens with animals" card not me.
As far as i am concerned, i consider it unnatural because it goes against physiology. its as unnatural as other activities man indulges in that go against physiology. We still do them because we make a choice. If people want to make that choice its up to them. But they shouldnt try to illicit special treatment or elevate chosen behaviour to innate instinct.
I know "natural" and "acceptable" are different. My views on it being natural was in response to the views that it was . Existence in the animal kingdom is not a premise for "natural". Its the gay community thats using this argument. The gay community over the years has failed to prove that 1) it is innate or genetic and 2) it is irreversible so they have pulled out the "it happens with animals" card not me.
As far as i am concerned, i consider it unnatural because it goes against physiology. its as unnatural as other activities man indulges in that go against physiology. We still do them because we make a choice. If people want to make that choice its up to them. But they shouldnt try to illicit special treatment or elevate chosen behaviour to innate instinct.
Respect
GIASI