Daniel: A good question! But let's look at things step by step:
First, Muslims staying in western countries (and they are in millions) do obey the laws of the country in which they reside. Following their own religion is their personal matter. If the west prides itself in upholding democratic values, where then lies the problem? Why don't you allow Muslims to follow the rules of their religion called the Shariah, freely? The country I come from is predominantly a Muslim one, but it has Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and atheist tribes etc. also present and we all live in complete harmony with no restriction of any kind in the practice of any faith.
Second, your statement that a "Muslim can have four wives according to his religion" simply reflects your shallow knowledge of Islam. Just to update you, the rule says "up to" four "l-e-g-a-l" wives. The rule goes on to add "that he must be able to treat all the four wives equally." While Sharia allows the freedom, over 90% of married Muslims you will come across will be having just a single wife. It's not that easy Daniel! Having said that, my query to you "is it not better to have another l-e-g-a-l wife if for any reason a man is unhappy with his first wife, rather than go about having very secretly "a jolly good time" with several other women as is common in the west and possibly in your country as well? Having the religious backing of having more than one legal wife, saves any society or country from a host of problems. It allows offspring to know who their "r-e-a-l" is, Daniel. In some countries of the West, when government forms need to be filled, they ask for the "mother's name". Why not the fathers? That's because the name of the father may be a "bit doubtful!"
Lastly, the most important question remains: Why is the West after just Muslims alone? There are so many other religions in the West but they are not targeted. As I have already pointed out in my article, there are well-funded organizations in the West whose job is to spew hatred against Muslims in a planned, organized manner.. Every now then you have someone drawing and publishing caricatures of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). Why are no such caricatures made of Buddha or the many Hindu gods and goddesses? Have you ever (repeat ever) seen a caricature made of Jesus Christ (PBUH) by any Muslim? I am challenging you on this.
The "democracy" you westerners pride in, is nothing but just a tool in hands of people especially political pundits to use in their favour for their own means. Period.
Daniel: A good question! But let's look at things step by step:
First, Muslims staying in western countries (and they are in millions) do obey the laws of the country in which they reside. Following their own religion is their personal matter. If the west prides itself in upholding democratic values, where then lies the problem? Why don't you allow Muslims to follow the rules of their religion called the Shariah, freely? The country I come from is predominantly a Muslim one, but it has Christians, Hindus, Sikhs and atheist tribes etc. also present and we all live in complete harmony with no restriction of any kind in the practice of any faith.
Second, your statement that a "Muslim can have four wives according to his religion" simply reflects your shallow knowledge of Islam. Just to update you, the rule says "up to" four "l-e-g-a-l" wives. The rule goes on to add "that he must be able to treat all the four wives equally." While Sharia allows the freedom, over 90% of married Muslims you will come across will be having just a single wife. It's not that easy Daniel! Having said that, my query to you "is it not better to have another l-e-g-a-l wife if for any reason a man is unhappy with his first wife, rather than go about having very secretly "a jolly good time" with several other women as is common in the west and possibly in your country as well? Having the religious backing of having more than one legal wife, saves any society or country from a host of problems. It allows offspring to know who their "r-e-a-l" is, Daniel. In some countries of the West, when government forms need to be filled, they ask for the "mother's name". Why not the fathers? That's because the name of the father may be a "bit doubtful!"
Lastly, the most important question remains: Why is the West after just Muslims alone? There are so many other religions in the West but they are not targeted. As I have already pointed out in my article, there are well-funded organizations in the West whose job is to spew hatred against Muslims in a planned, organized manner.. Every now then you have someone drawing and publishing caricatures of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH). Why are no such caricatures made of Buddha or the many Hindu gods and goddesses? Have you ever (repeat ever) seen a caricature made of Jesus Christ (PBUH) by any Muslim? I am challenging you on this.
The "democracy" you westerners pride in, is nothing but just a tool in hands of people especially political pundits to use in their favour for their own means. Period.