Hi @acchabaccha. She actually left Qatar and went to Sri Lanka to exit. So technically, she used the exit permit that was issued to her by her sponsor. She was promised by her sponsor that once she exited Qatar, her visa will already be cancelled. However, she waited a long time in Sri Lanka and never got a response from the sponsor if the visa has been/will be cancelled. Running out of savings, she went back to Qatar and looked for a new job. She had been in contact with the sponsor since her return in Qatar but the sponsor "seen" all the messages sent to her and rejected all calls she makes. The point is, how was she tagged as runaway while she has done all efforts to communicate with the sponsor? Isn't it unfair for the employee side?
Hi @acchabaccha. She actually left Qatar and went to Sri Lanka to exit. So technically, she used the exit permit that was issued to her by her sponsor. She was promised by her sponsor that once she exited Qatar, her visa will already be cancelled. However, she waited a long time in Sri Lanka and never got a response from the sponsor if the visa has been/will be cancelled. Running out of savings, she went back to Qatar and looked for a new job. She had been in contact with the sponsor since her return in Qatar but the sponsor "seen" all the messages sent to her and rejected all calls she makes. The point is, how was she tagged as runaway while she has done all efforts to communicate with the sponsor? Isn't it unfair for the employee side?