This is becoming ridiculous now and the level of double standards are truly amazing.
OK - Samsung said that 2.5million devices have been sold and that only 1 in every 42000 are at risk. That means there are a total of 59.5 Note 7's that are at risk. Now, factor in that 36 have already melted, that means there are only 24 left... in the entire world! Samsung are about to release the IMEI's of the 24 (in addition to an app!) that are left so we can all identify our phones are at risk or not in the next few days.
Why double standards? iPhones 5's were famous bak in 2013/14 for battery meltdowns yet, they were not banned .... many, many other lithium battery devices have similar meltdown issues.
I do of course appreciate the risk for safety and that life is paramount BUT, if the Note 7 is banned from being powered up then so should ALL lithium battery powered devices.
This is becoming ridiculous now and the level of double standards are truly amazing.
OK - Samsung said that 2.5million devices have been sold and that only 1 in every 42000 are at risk. That means there are a total of 59.5 Note 7's that are at risk. Now, factor in that 36 have already melted, that means there are only 24 left... in the entire world! Samsung are about to release the IMEI's of the 24 (in addition to an app!) that are left so we can all identify our phones are at risk or not in the next few days.
Why double standards? iPhones 5's were famous bak in 2013/14 for battery meltdowns yet, they were not banned .... many, many other lithium battery devices have similar meltdown issues.
I do of course appreciate the risk for safety and that life is paramount BUT, if the Note 7 is banned from being powered up then so should ALL lithium battery powered devices.