The proposed changes are basically to transfer the sponsorship control from private sponsors to the govt. (Ministry of Interior) which would not effectively solve this long standing issue. The two types of employment contracts would further complicate the bonded labor practice in the market. It seems that the changes are well influenced by the local business houses who want their workers to remain in their control by way of new tough employment contracts. Honestly the local business houses should not fear if they loose control on the workers, because they have the right ability and capacity that can hire more talented people which are abundant in supply world wide. Moreover the business empires should no longer be built on the aspiration and dreams of poor migrant workers.
The proposed changes are basically to transfer the sponsorship control from private sponsors to the govt. (Ministry of Interior) which would not effectively solve this long standing issue. The two types of employment contracts would further complicate the bonded labor practice in the market. It seems that the changes are well influenced by the local business houses who want their workers to remain in their control by way of new tough employment contracts. Honestly the local business houses should not fear if they loose control on the workers, because they have the right ability and capacity that can hire more talented people which are abundant in supply world wide. Moreover the business empires should no longer be built on the aspiration and dreams of poor migrant workers.