Let's just assume, for a 1 second, that it's acceptable for a man to say that it's a woman's role to be the 'homemaker'.
If you accept that, don't you also have to accept that it's the husband's role to go out and EARN a living by WORKING?
There are plenty of men in this country that I know who manage to have money without needing to work for it. They can spend their days at leisure, not lifting a finger, while the bank balance magically stays topped up.
So if a woman wants to hire maids and nannies and cooks, isn't this equivalent?
Isn't it a double standard to still expect women to do "women's work", when men aren't doing "men's work"?
Let's just assume, for a 1 second, that it's acceptable for a man to say that it's a woman's role to be the 'homemaker'.
If you accept that, don't you also have to accept that it's the husband's role to go out and EARN a living by WORKING?
There are plenty of men in this country that I know who manage to have money without needing to work for it. They can spend their days at leisure, not lifting a finger, while the bank balance magically stays topped up.
So if a woman wants to hire maids and nannies and cooks, isn't this equivalent?
Isn't it a double standard to still expect women to do "women's work", when men aren't doing "men's work"?