you are still explaining things to fatimah like you were on the bus when that happened..when you are in fact the third party in the chain of narration..

show me where i implied you were lying or that this did not happen and i will apologize..merely casting light on the fact that this is not a verified tale does not imply its a lie..in fact, i agreed that these sick and weird things do happen..considering how completely you misunderstood britexpat in a separate thread yesterday and how you miss my point so completely here, I now think your basic problem is comprehension of what you read, how the sentence you are reading relates to the one before or after it. 'Paranoia' it seems..the nerve!

your posts are for curiosity? about what? about how we would respond or what we thought of the story? well, in that case, you have made it a trial, us the judge and going by how you are debating with fatimah, yourself the attorney.