when I did not even say it's relevant. Are you an approving party at the Authority.

You know that the normal is man to sponsor, so woman to sponsor will even be more "challenging". I just did mention about he profession because I know two case with my colleagues.

Now I wonder what is illegal about the second proposal. If the husband is and can be sponsored by the company, what is wrong about that? They want the woman (if they really want her badly), I said, "maybe" she can bargained for her husband.