Is there a rule that a partcular no. of westerners or a partcular no. of Asians are to be employed...cos if it is then it needs to relooked at by whosoever as it doesnt justify the cost benefit analysis (may be the pinch isnt felt now as oil is flowing and everything seems fine but then it was the same just a few months back with several countries before the economic collapse/ difficulties currently faced by them due to their unruly behavior when it came to spending and hence should be act as an eye opener)...if not then the arguement of less people or more people from a particular part again doesnt fit well.

As for the arguement that the Asian countries cannot provide to their fellow citizens the kind of income they can have here and so they run to this part and hence should either be complaining to their govts. or shut up, guess this statement falls flat in the eye of the fact that the said asian countries are developing countries (I am bit generous in using this word) with population much much larger than the developed countries...so if a developed country cannot provide its handful (yeah, comparatively) of people with what they expect should the people from Asian countries be advised to shut up when the basis of arguement for equality of benefits is "JOB" for which one is hired, irrespective.