not worth re-reading, (advice to everyone), the grammar, spelling and how it was written is very poor - as if it was done by a 10 year old.
To be honest, not sure what the point of it was - there are better articles on this elsewhere. Perhaps you did not really understand it? Not surprising since, as I stated, it was very poorly worded.
And what I was saying initially is that it may not be possible for venezuela to 'take back its gold' as it is collateral for loans and since there is no suggestion that they are going to pay off the loans, it will be interesting to see if it will happen at all.
not worth re-reading, (advice to everyone), the grammar, spelling and how it was written is very poor - as if it was done by a 10 year old.
To be honest, not sure what the point of it was - there are better articles on this elsewhere. Perhaps you did not really understand it? Not surprising since, as I stated, it was very poorly worded.
And what I was saying initially is that it may not be possible for venezuela to 'take back its gold' as it is collateral for loans and since there is no suggestion that they are going to pay off the loans, it will be interesting to see if it will happen at all.