I've written dozen times before that reports of crime are accessed by the local media through the courts whereas they should be sourced directly from the law-enforcement departments concerned, which is the case in most countries around the world except here.
The reports doesn't mention whether the case is taken through civil, sharia or family court. Thus, the sentences are different from one another
If the victim ( or the family ) accepted blood money, the verdict varies as per sharia law
It's the media law that needs a review.