Eye for an eye confuses me. If they had caused the loss of somebody's hand, then I can understand them loosing their hand. But surly if they have stolen from somebody, then their punishment should be to have something stolen from them? Wouldn't that be an eye for an eye?
Eye for an eye confuses me. If they had caused the loss of somebody's hand, then I can understand them loosing their hand. But surly if they have stolen from somebody, then their punishment should be to have something stolen from them? Wouldn't that be an eye for an eye?