gtim: this scenario is hypothetical. Do you really want to define terms?
spongeboob: if you knew what I meant, why did you ask??
FS: Actually, all WK said was that highly educated women who choose to stay at home are taking seats that could be used by men who will then go on to get some great job and support some huge family. My question, which has gone unanswered, is if the woman knew at the time she was pursuing this education that she would be staying at home. It is also possible that she had planned a career and, after getting married and having children, decided to stay at home. On a similar note, men who are educated but unmarried, can we also hold them accountable for "stealing" seats and opportunities from married men with families? If so, should we hold off on education and careers until people get married and have children?
gtim: this scenario is hypothetical. Do you really want to define terms?
spongeboob: if you knew what I meant, why did you ask??
FS: Actually, all WK said was that highly educated women who choose to stay at home are taking seats that could be used by men who will then go on to get some great job and support some huge family. My question, which has gone unanswered, is if the woman knew at the time she was pursuing this education that she would be staying at home. It is also possible that she had planned a career and, after getting married and having children, decided to stay at home. On a similar note, men who are educated but unmarried, can we also hold them accountable for "stealing" seats and opportunities from married men with families? If so, should we hold off on education and careers until people get married and have children?