There is nothing that is right about this. Why would you want to give control to what has proved to be a less than honest and transperant developer.
I agree with hotandsticky, there will be no end to the fees and new fees will be introduced daily. The term "unreasonably exceed the tariff of other providers" should not be allowed under contract law.
Basic contract law does not allow for one party to charge a open ended, non specific series of fees that put the other person at a disadvantage. It is designed, in theory, to protect both parties. How can you clearly define "not unreasonably exceed"? It means different things to different people and is indefinable.
It is not reasonable or acceptable for me to accept paying more than market price, so how can we then enter into a contract where I'm guaranteed to pay more with no upper limits. A reasonable amount in this case for FQ may be 25% or more than the current market price. For them this would be reasonable and for me unacceptable.
This is wrong and I will not sign. This is something I would be prepared to go to court for and challenge. Enough from this developer and their conniving ways.
There is nothing that is right about this. Why would you want to give control to what has proved to be a less than honest and transperant developer.
I agree with hotandsticky, there will be no end to the fees and new fees will be introduced daily. The term "unreasonably exceed the tariff of other providers" should not be allowed under contract law.
Basic contract law does not allow for one party to charge a open ended, non specific series of fees that put the other person at a disadvantage. It is designed, in theory, to protect both parties. How can you clearly define "not unreasonably exceed"? It means different things to different people and is indefinable.
It is not reasonable or acceptable for me to accept paying more than market price, so how can we then enter into a contract where I'm guaranteed to pay more with no upper limits. A reasonable amount in this case for FQ may be 25% or more than the current market price. For them this would be reasonable and for me unacceptable.
This is wrong and I will not sign. This is something I would be prepared to go to court for and challenge. Enough from this developer and their conniving ways.