It amuses me that those who are utterly convinced of something for which there is no evidence are so ready to to publicly proclaim there is no evidence of something that has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. The ignorance is astounding.
The sun isn't stationary (unless you have a wierd cosmology that puts the sun at the centre of the universe) and there are species that grade from one into another with no "missing links". Look up "ring species".
The "big bang" is nothing to do with Darwin's theory and has no relevance to it.
The efforts to pretend there is an equivalence in value and nature of belief between religious faith and scientific understanding are insulting, probably to the religious as well as the scientifically inclined.
It amuses me that those who are utterly convinced of something for which there is no evidence are so ready to to publicly proclaim there is no evidence of something that has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt. The ignorance is astounding.
The sun isn't stationary (unless you have a wierd cosmology that puts the sun at the centre of the universe) and there are species that grade from one into another with no "missing links". Look up "ring species".
The "big bang" is nothing to do with Darwin's theory and has no relevance to it.
The efforts to pretend there is an equivalence in value and nature of belief between religious faith and scientific understanding are insulting, probably to the religious as well as the scientifically inclined.