It should be easy to accept someone who says he does not believe in god. This is pretty basic tolerance. If an atheist asks a believer: What's the difference between your god and an imaginary god?...and the believer's answer is vague and/or nonsensical, then it's onbvious the believer doesn't have much clue what he's really talking about, so why should he get angry/frustrated with the atheist for exposing his weak arguments?
It should be easy to accept someone who says he does not believe in god. This is pretty basic tolerance. If an atheist asks a believer: What's the difference between your god and an imaginary god?...and the believer's answer is vague and/or nonsensical, then it's onbvious the believer doesn't have much clue what he's really talking about, so why should he get angry/frustrated with the atheist for exposing his weak arguments?