garnet06ph is right in the sense that he's not a hostage and the company should take responsibility.
He is the only officer of the company at the material time (even though he's resigned now) who is still within jurisdiction of Qatar.
Companies who do not honour their commitments or run away when trouble comes should be held accountable.
So the criticism is that no one wants to do business in Qatar and Qatar will suffer for it, so there? But at the end of the day, what is the source of the problem? It's not Qatar, which has opened its doors to foreigners to develop the country and what does it find? Some unscrupulous quarters out to take advantage of it.
So then it goes into a downward spiral - Qatar had to find ways to (further) protect itself (and its people - its primary focus), hence the restrictive rules. The execution of which has been relaxed, depending on individual circumstances, but then again, some people take advantage of that, and then land into trouble (eg. harm people by their thoughtless actions) and then the rules get enforced more strictly, etc,etc.,etc. Can people see that their actions actually harm themselves and others? It's like, if they're smart or lucky, they get away with it.
Can say that life is like that, smart people get away with it, and therein lies the justification for doing it because then people will hold them in high regard for being "smart".
Crux of the matter - objective - personal benefit or community benefit. Default mission, if you will. If it's for personal benefit, sooner or later, things will not go your way. What goes around comes around one day. Community benefit - looking out for others, will also come around one day. People you never met or known, could end up helping you, so why sweat the small stuff?
Ok. Off tangent. The Cookie Monster put me up to it. I swear... by the moon and the stars and the ... ummm.. whatever...
*****************************************
The Cookie Monster said it.
I also don't plagiarize...
garnet06ph is right in the sense that he's not a hostage and the company should take responsibility.
He is the only officer of the company at the material time (even though he's resigned now) who is still within jurisdiction of Qatar.
Companies who do not honour their commitments or run away when trouble comes should be held accountable.
So the criticism is that no one wants to do business in Qatar and Qatar will suffer for it, so there? But at the end of the day, what is the source of the problem? It's not Qatar, which has opened its doors to foreigners to develop the country and what does it find? Some unscrupulous quarters out to take advantage of it.
So then it goes into a downward spiral - Qatar had to find ways to (further) protect itself (and its people - its primary focus), hence the restrictive rules. The execution of which has been relaxed, depending on individual circumstances, but then again, some people take advantage of that, and then land into trouble (eg. harm people by their thoughtless actions) and then the rules get enforced more strictly, etc,etc.,etc. Can people see that their actions actually harm themselves and others? It's like, if they're smart or lucky, they get away with it.
Can say that life is like that, smart people get away with it, and therein lies the justification for doing it because then people will hold them in high regard for being "smart".
Crux of the matter - objective - personal benefit or community benefit. Default mission, if you will. If it's for personal benefit, sooner or later, things will not go your way. What goes around comes around one day. Community benefit - looking out for others, will also come around one day. People you never met or known, could end up helping you, so why sweat the small stuff?
Ok. Off tangent. The Cookie Monster put me up to it. I swear... by the moon and the stars and the ... ummm.. whatever...
*****************************************
The Cookie Monster said it.
I also don't plagiarize...