Step aside simpletons this is work for the master of Einstein
The statement 2=1 is false, here is the proof:
Culturally the term no. 2 is spoken when describing taking a dump. While no. 1 is spoken when one has to take a whiz.
Dump is not equal to Whiz. Sometimes you may take a dump and a whiz at the same time, but they are not equally stimulating as taking a dump.Many great men in the past have come up with great ideas to benefit the world while taking a dump. Coming back to the formula [dump]2<[whiz]1 Therefore we cannot say 2=1.
I hope this is a satisfactory answer to your query.
Good Fortune always comes knocking at your door...when you are sh*tting in the toilet!! :)
Step aside simpletons this is work for the master of Einstein
The statement 2=1 is false, here is the proof:
Culturally the term no. 2 is spoken when describing taking a dump. While no. 1 is spoken when one has to take a whiz.
Dump is not equal to Whiz. Sometimes you may take a dump and a whiz at the same time, but they are not equally stimulating as taking a dump.Many great men in the past have come up with great ideas to benefit the world while taking a dump. Coming back to the formula [dump]2<[whiz]1 Therefore we cannot say 2=1.
I hope this is a satisfactory answer to your query.
Good Fortune always comes knocking at your door...when you are sh*tting in the toilet!! :)
_[]~SMoKE~[]_