Being no "scholar",,, I am in no need to be dependent on any peer reviewd journal. Creative thought doesn't need to be recognized by official authorities. Time itself proves validity of true creative thought. Despite it,,, obove referred short article has been liked by editors of Journal issued by Royal Institute of Philosophy. Their only concern was that the article was too short to be published.
In addition,,, it is not logical to get creative thought be authenticated with the help of any peer reviewd journal. "Peers" review things on the basis of already establshed "theories"... What if someone rightfully criticizes established theories? Logically ... such criticism cannot find any place in peer reviewd journals. Only time shows the validity thereof.
Being indexed on google tells at least that how much work has been done on topic. To be "authority" is another thing and to be "influensive" is another thing. I am happy that i am not any authority!
I am independent. Total freelance thinker. I don't give references to established theories ... to support my ideas. I only give solid reasons. Readers understand at their own... Not because i m some authority... But because i make my points understandable to them. I don't lecture at any University. But I have offer of PHd Philosophy from at least two universities. But i m in no need to authenticate my views with the help of any degree. Some educational institutes give my articles as assignments to their students.
I am not trying to tell that i m any scholar or even intellectual.
Only point was just that at least i m not any ignorant or having any small mind...!!!
And what points do you ppl have after all...??? Just that since something is a natural phenomenon in animal kingdom... so it justifies certain ill human affairs...???
Are you ppl not having small minds...???
What makes you think that humans are just animals??? Because they have similar DNA?? Or evolution just...???
Don't you ppl know that humans are equipped with many advanced features??? Don't you know that ego and super ego are the features of only humans? Don't you know that animals just can't "Think"! They only perceive things. They can only be clever. They cannot be wise!
They cannot theorize things. They don't possess any system of ethics...!!!
Just try to get your reasons straight. Try to tell me or explain me why humans are just animals...???
I m not scholar at all. See my short article on difference between a scholar and an intellectual:
Difference between an Intellectual and a Scholar"
Being no "scholar",,, I am in no need to be dependent on any peer reviewd journal. Creative thought doesn't need to be recognized by official authorities. Time itself proves validity of true creative thought. Despite it,,, obove referred short article has been liked by editors of Journal issued by Royal Institute of Philosophy. Their only concern was that the article was too short to be published.
In addition,,, it is not logical to get creative thought be authenticated with the help of any peer reviewd journal. "Peers" review things on the basis of already establshed "theories"... What if someone rightfully criticizes established theories? Logically ... such criticism cannot find any place in peer reviewd journals. Only time shows the validity thereof.
Being indexed on google tells at least that how much work has been done on topic. To be "authority" is another thing and to be "influensive" is another thing. I am happy that i am not any authority!
I am independent. Total freelance thinker. I don't give references to established theories ... to support my ideas. I only give solid reasons. Readers understand at their own... Not because i m some authority... But because i make my points understandable to them. I don't lecture at any University. But I have offer of PHd Philosophy from at least two universities. But i m in no need to authenticate my views with the help of any degree. Some educational institutes give my articles as assignments to their students.
I am not trying to tell that i m any scholar or even intellectual.
Only point was just that at least i m not any ignorant or having any small mind...!!!
And what points do you ppl have after all...??? Just that since something is a natural phenomenon in animal kingdom... so it justifies certain ill human affairs...???
Are you ppl not having small minds...???
What makes you think that humans are just animals??? Because they have similar DNA?? Or evolution just...???
Don't you ppl know that humans are equipped with many advanced features??? Don't you know that ego and super ego are the features of only humans? Don't you know that animals just can't "Think"! They only perceive things. They can only be clever. They cannot be wise!
They cannot theorize things. They don't possess any system of ethics...!!!
Just try to get your reasons straight. Try to tell me or explain me why humans are just animals...???