Khalid, the fly in your ointment, so to speak, is contained in your quote:
"Environmental and other external influences keep on modifying his blueprint."
Some scientists believe that these 'other external influences' include the child's genes, the mother's hormones, chromosones etc.
Many will argue that the child is gay long before being born.
If you want to engage in a reasoned, scientific debate about behavioural science, stop quoting *religious* websites and start quoting *scientific* ones.
Your arguments carry little weight when they come from such biased sources. Your arguments may be right, but most people won't bother reading them when, like me, they scroll to the end of your post, see that you've quoted (yet again) from an Islamic website, and then tune out.
It's like reading evidence from McDonald's the burgers are healthy. Possibly the evidence is right, but most people will dismiss it out of hand because they feel that the source is biased, so the evidence will be tainted.
Khalid, the fly in your ointment, so to speak, is contained in your quote:
"Environmental and other external influences keep on modifying his blueprint."
Some scientists believe that these 'other external influences' include the child's genes, the mother's hormones, chromosones etc.
Many will argue that the child is gay long before being born.
If you want to engage in a reasoned, scientific debate about behavioural science, stop quoting *religious* websites and start quoting *scientific* ones.
Your arguments carry little weight when they come from such biased sources. Your arguments may be right, but most people won't bother reading them when, like me, they scroll to the end of your post, see that you've quoted (yet again) from an Islamic website, and then tune out.
It's like reading evidence from McDonald's the burgers are healthy. Possibly the evidence is right, but most people will dismiss it out of hand because they feel that the source is biased, so the evidence will be tainted.