Against my better judgement, I'm going to reply to our learned friend Daniel.

Before I begin, drop the caps. It makes you look like a 4 year old child who has only learnt to write in upper case script. Try using lower case like the big people. Easier to read and less offensive in the netequitte style guide.

Secondly, the science is undecided about the source(s) of homosexuality. Some scientists deny the genetic link, but others, contrary to your post (you say: "NO SCIENTIFIC RECORDS SHOW THAT") do believe there is a genetic link:

http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0002282

http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/273/1605/3031.abstract

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v445/n7124/full/445158b.html

http://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality.html

http://sax.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/6/1/67

(And that's just a selection I found after about 2 minutes of searching on the net.)

There are studies that link homosexuality to genetic factors, and there are studies that deny such a link. Other studies attribute homosexuality to the environment a child was raised in, whilst others propose a link to ante-natal hormone levels.

The truth is, there is no consensus amongst scientists.

If you had stuck your nose in a few science books, you would know that.