Hmm, saying that you can take the shame out of prostitution is a bit like saying what if the sky turned bubble gum pink and it rained jellybeans once a week; novel idea but not going to happen.
Shame can never be taken from prostitution. What about children born out of these "service"? Do you get a waiver when you walk into the brothel saying you will not be liable for any bastard children? who takes care of them then? Tax payers (whom not all use or perhaps approve of such service)? Do we need to take the shame out of more and more children growing up without fathers? Points such as these would add social shame to this.
How can anyone be sure that monogamous partners agree to the others use of these services? Then wouldnt it be a set up to break apart homes as hey, its a normal thing to do right?
Also, if this was the attitude towards prostitution and anyone could do it wouldnt the wage go down a wee bit? It doesnt take a rocket scientist to sell themselves for money. Would this service "better" the society in which adopted it? Hardly. If hookers were a dime a dozen and you could walk into one like a hair salon the rules of supply and demand would surely apply.
Regardless of religion placing shame on such activities, I agree with Gypsy, even atheist find this demeaning and morally wrong. _____________________________________________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock - Will Rogers"
Hmm, saying that you can take the shame out of prostitution is a bit like saying what if the sky turned bubble gum pink and it rained jellybeans once a week; novel idea but not going to happen.
Shame can never be taken from prostitution. What about children born out of these "service"? Do you get a waiver when you walk into the brothel saying you will not be liable for any bastard children? who takes care of them then? Tax payers (whom not all use or perhaps approve of such service)? Do we need to take the shame out of more and more children growing up without fathers? Points such as these would add social shame to this.
How can anyone be sure that monogamous partners agree to the others use of these services? Then wouldnt it be a set up to break apart homes as hey, its a normal thing to do right?
Also, if this was the attitude towards prostitution and anyone could do it wouldnt the wage go down a wee bit? It doesnt take a rocket scientist to sell themselves for money. Would this service "better" the society in which adopted it? Hardly. If hookers were a dime a dozen and you could walk into one like a hair salon the rules of supply and demand would surely apply.
Regardless of religion placing shame on such activities, I agree with Gypsy, even atheist find this demeaning and morally wrong. _____________________________________________________
"Diplomacy is the art of saying 'Nice doggie' until you can find a rock - Will Rogers"