In context with my yesterday's post I understand from the tragic incident that the family was a bunch of illiterate ppl & generally illiterates cannot differentiate evil & good to some extent.
* Her relationship with the man:-
The role of mother was very evil in this story that we read but I feel that maybe (as we are not aware of the reality & real story & all our viewpoints are based on the incident published in the newspaper) the lady did 'Nikah' with this man in front of some molvi so per Islamic conditions they are man & wife but because they didnt apply for a formal Nikah paper doesnt make their relationship illegitimate because for that you need to have witnesses by your side & because asian cultures frown upon a woman with children to remarry she wanted to hide it for sometime & later on when the relationship to that man was out she didnt mind not applying for the Nikah Contract or maybe because of sheer ignorance & not understanding the consequences she might face in future she didnt apply.
* Letting her daughters in the hands of husband:-
Maybe she was forced by her husband to allow him to do whatever he wanted to do with the kids but I maintain still she shouldn't have allowed him to do so. Maybe she was convinced by her husband that because they are not his real daughters so it wont be a sin & being an illiterate she agreed. Maybe he didnt talk to her at all & paid unwanted visits to the children & acted like maniac. But when she finally knew what's happening to her kids she should have protected them but as per my understanding, to illiterates the means of income or food is more important than honour & maybe because of this faith she closed her eyes towards all the horrible crimes happening to her children.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CONFUSE ............ if you cannot convince! <
In context with my yesterday's post I understand from the tragic incident that the family was a bunch of illiterate ppl & generally illiterates cannot differentiate evil & good to some extent.
* Her relationship with the man:-
The role of mother was very evil in this story that we read but I feel that maybe (as we are not aware of the reality & real story & all our viewpoints are based on the incident published in the newspaper) the lady did 'Nikah' with this man in front of some molvi so per Islamic conditions they are man & wife but because they didnt apply for a formal Nikah paper doesnt make their relationship illegitimate because for that you need to have witnesses by your side & because asian cultures frown upon a woman with children to remarry she wanted to hide it for sometime & later on when the relationship to that man was out she didnt mind not applying for the Nikah Contract or maybe because of sheer ignorance & not understanding the consequences she might face in future she didnt apply.
* Letting her daughters in the hands of husband:-
Maybe she was forced by her husband to allow him to do whatever he wanted to do with the kids but I maintain still she shouldn't have allowed him to do so. Maybe she was convinced by her husband that because they are not his real daughters so it wont be a sin & being an illiterate she agreed. Maybe he didnt talk to her at all & paid unwanted visits to the children & acted like maniac. But when she finally knew what's happening to her kids she should have protected them but as per my understanding, to illiterates the means of income or food is more important than honour & maybe because of this faith she closed her eyes towards all the horrible crimes happening to her children.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CONFUSE ............ if you cannot convince!
<