but agree with Gypsy on the anecdote as towards the end the argument is lost... as any debate using philosophy can then argue that given premise 1. that the professor is human, premise 2. that science has provided factual evidence that all humans have a brain (this does not mean that all humans use it ) premise 3. premise one and two are known Truths
there fore the professor has a brain.
there fore the last part of the anecdote and argument is false.
"Your born, You Live, You Die, given this premise, one can conclude since we have no control over when we are born and when we die, the only thing that matters to us should be how we live, simple really?" Mis-Cat to her philosophy Lecturer.
Flan is back here any way....
but agree with Gypsy on the anecdote as towards the end the argument is lost... as any debate using philosophy can then argue that given premise 1. that the professor is human, premise 2. that science has provided factual evidence that all humans have a brain (this does not mean that all humans use it ) premise 3. premise one and two are known Truths
there fore the professor has a brain.
there fore the last part of the anecdote and argument is false.
"Your born, You Live, You Die, given this premise, one can conclude since we have no control over when we are born and when we die, the only thing that matters to us should be how we live, simple really?" Mis-Cat to her philosophy Lecturer.