"Whenever The US and Britain interfere ...
in the internal affairs of a sovereign state to try and prevent tyrany, genocide and starvation they are criticized for pursuing their own interests and agendas". My dear Tigasil, that was my whole point. That is the meida coverage for all US and british foriegn policy interventions. You could have taken that from the lips of a CNN broadcaster. You assume that these governments are actually pursuing the upholding of human rights and the rights of minorities as they so successfully portray themselves in the media. But you really have to question that when those same governments act in total cantradictions to such noble values and hide it from the rest of the world. The simple fact is that the US an its stooges are ruled by one sole system: CAPITALISM. All means are justified in the pursuit of their own interests even if those means coincide with human rights issues. How could the US train, arm, support and assist a tyrannt and in some cases aiding him in accession to power and then years later turn on him and accuse him of human rights abuse? Is it the awakening of conscience? Pity Saddam Hussein isn't around anymore to answer these questions ;)
"Whenever The US and Britain interfere ...
in the internal affairs of a sovereign state to try and prevent tyrany, genocide and starvation they are criticized for pursuing their own interests and agendas". My dear Tigasil, that was my whole point. That is the meida coverage for all US and british foriegn policy interventions. You could have taken that from the lips of a CNN broadcaster. You assume that these governments are actually pursuing the upholding of human rights and the rights of minorities as they so successfully portray themselves in the media. But you really have to question that when those same governments act in total cantradictions to such noble values and hide it from the rest of the world. The simple fact is that the US an its stooges are ruled by one sole system: CAPITALISM. All means are justified in the pursuit of their own interests even if those means coincide with human rights issues. How could the US train, arm, support and assist a tyrannt and in some cases aiding him in accession to power and then years later turn on him and accuse him of human rights abuse? Is it the awakening of conscience? Pity Saddam Hussein isn't around anymore to answer these questions ;)