How can the consent of the parent not matter? If it was done by the consent of the "child" alone then I would be very concerned? But the mere fact that the parents of the child gave consent got paid a nice neat monetary figure tells me that maybe the parents of the child warrant looking into? or could it just be a mountain out of a mole hill? I think it does exactly what the artist had intended in the first place, those that see it as porn are the ones that maybe we should keep a closer eye on, and those that see it nothing more than a piece of art can appreciate it