I think there is alot missing from the articles that have been pasted here first of all the girl in the pic is now 11yo and it was her mother that took the photo, her father is a well known art critic in Australia here is a link to how she feels about the whole thing http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/naked-girl-offended-by-pm/2008/07/07/121...
As for the other art that was mentioned By Bill Henson the"children" involved in that were 13yo and did it with there parents consent the trouble is I think people are getting to carried away with it any person in there right mind an tell the diff between art and porn I have photo's of my kids taken by hubby (black and white,sepia tone)naked on the beach, does this mean that we have taken these photo's because we love kiddie porn? or is it just that my hubby happens to be an excellent photographer (esp when it comes to black and white & sepia) and the way he captured the light esp in the sepia tones makes my kids look angelic?
I think there is alot missing from the articles that have been pasted here first of all the girl in the pic is now 11yo and it was her mother that took the photo, her father is a well known art critic in Australia here is a link to how she feels about the whole thing
http://www.smh.com.au/news/arts/naked-girl-offended-by-pm/2008/07/07/121...
As for the other art that was mentioned By Bill Henson the"children" involved in that were 13yo and did it with there parents consent the trouble is I think people are getting to carried away with it any person in there right mind an tell the diff between art and porn I have photo's of my kids taken by hubby (black and white,sepia tone)naked on the beach, does this mean that we have taken these photo's because we love kiddie porn? or is it just that my hubby happens to be an excellent photographer (esp when it comes to black and white & sepia) and the way he captured the light esp in the sepia tones makes my kids look angelic?