As long as there is undisputed historical proof of a crime, and there is somebody makgin a claim to apology and compensation, then there is a case to be addressed. If anybody can trace their origin back to the date of the event and the origin of the transgressor to the same date then the case is theoretically legally valid. Of course the further you go back in history, the more difficult that gets so such cases as the roman empire and the 5th century english become lost on that technicallity. But 200 years is historically very recent and Mayasunil has the right to address this issue. Even more recent is the Palestinian cause for that matter and their case is still very valid and very current and if not addressed, will be the cause for another regional, maybe global war between faiths and races. Don't you agree? After all, we all want a safer world free of war and suffering no?
As long as there is undisputed historical proof of a crime, and there is somebody makgin a claim to apology and compensation, then there is a case to be addressed. If anybody can trace their origin back to the date of the event and the origin of the transgressor to the same date then the case is theoretically legally valid. Of course the further you go back in history, the more difficult that gets so such cases as the roman empire and the 5th century english become lost on that technicallity. But 200 years is historically very recent and Mayasunil has the right to address this issue. Even more recent is the Palestinian cause for that matter and their case is still very valid and very current and if not addressed, will be the cause for another regional, maybe global war between faiths and races. Don't you agree? After all, we all want a safer world free of war and suffering no?