of hypocracy here.. In other posts, most of you, especially Gypsy have basically advocate the notion "to each his own", so what's dfferent here ?
Is it because a woman is involved ?
Firstly, let me say that I think he's a toad for even contemplating such an action..
Having said that - He say he's a Muslim and Islam allows for up to four wive at any given time.
Now even thow he's a moron, he can , n religious grounds get married.
However, perhaps the law in the country ofwhich he is a citizen may oer ride the Islamc law..
of hypocracy here.. In other posts, most of you, especially Gypsy have basically advocate the notion "to each his own", so what's dfferent here ?
Is it because a woman is involved ?
Firstly, let me say that I think he's a toad for even contemplating such an action..
Having said that - He say he's a Muslim and Islam allows for up to four wive at any given time.
Now even thow he's a moron, he can , n religious grounds get married.
However, perhaps the law in the country ofwhich he is a citizen may oer ride the Islamc law..