Between questioning a historical fact.....and questioning what someone "believes"....I still think you have the right to question everything!
But I also reiterate the difference between supporting the message ("what" is said) and defending someone's right to say something (whatever it may be).
Just as it IS possible to be pro gay rights without being gay.....I am pro free speech even while I may disagree with "what" is being said!
I don't know how much clearer I can make my position....my fingers are aching, and its almost time to head to class.
On another point....finally got to a 1,000 QL points yay!
Stay safe all.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?
Between questioning a historical fact.....and questioning what someone "believes"....I still think you have the right to question everything!
But I also reiterate the difference between supporting the message ("what" is said) and defending someone's right to say something (whatever it may be).
Just as it IS possible to be pro gay rights without being gay.....I am pro free speech even while I may disagree with "what" is being said!
I don't know how much clearer I can make my position....my fingers are aching, and its almost time to head to class.
On another point....finally got to a 1,000 QL points yay!
Stay safe all.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?