even you may be right occassionally. But not this time. Lets engage brain and try again.
The first wedding:
A GIRL of 15 was tricked into a "telephone marriage" ceremony to a Sheffield man with a mental age of five in a ceremony recognised by sharia (Islamic law).
Tha above wedding would not have been recognized in any state of the USA or the UK or Mexico. My point despite what you have all said is that this was allegedly recognized by Sharia law. The article says it was. You, Princess Habibah, nadt, abuamerican and manyana... all told meu before that this article had nothing to do with shariah law.
But this is exactly the point, according to the article it had everything to do with Islamic law. Now it could be that the article is wrong, I accept that or it could be that this partuclar Sharia board acted wrongly, I don't know. However, it had everything to do with Sharia law.
The time has come to substitute caution for courage. Martin Luther King, Birmingham, Alabama 1963
even you may be right occassionally. But not this time. Lets engage brain and try again.
The first wedding:
A GIRL of 15 was tricked into a "telephone marriage" ceremony to a Sheffield man with a mental age of five in a ceremony recognised by sharia (Islamic law).
Tha above wedding would not have been recognized in any state of the USA or the UK or Mexico. My point despite what you have all said is that this was allegedly recognized by Sharia law. The article says it was. You, Princess Habibah, nadt, abuamerican and manyana... all told meu before that this article had nothing to do with shariah law.
But this is exactly the point, according to the article it had everything to do with Islamic law. Now it could be that the article is wrong, I accept that or it could be that this partuclar Sharia board acted wrongly, I don't know. However, it had everything to do with Sharia law.
The time has come to substitute caution for courage. Martin Luther King, Birmingham, Alabama 1963