Well thank you very much for the (unexpected) compliment Knox :)

Actually these expenses were incurred before he took up his ambassadorial role in London. The ex-employee of the defendant worked for his father I believe. It is unclear whether this was his own money or his expense account.

Anyway, the point is that is is a huge amount of money that has been spent that some find offensivve and wasteful.

I'm surprised that you would have no objection to him purchasing hookers with his own money. Didn't you say on another thread that you believe that women should be fully covered and not appear in front of non-relatives? However you did say in the same sentence that there were some seriously hot chicks at Tehran Uni or some such words.

Ooer, I'm a bit confused.

_______________________________________________________
Love is the answer...