This is a text based medium of communication so a lot of the nuances are missed but if you want to be stricly literal then that's fine too.
You said Hamurabi was a joke and never explained what you were laughing about...so its up for interpretation.
I also never said GOD took Hamurabi's laws (in fact I don't beleive in god)...your ASSUMPTIONS in this matter are clearly wrong...I said the Ten commandements (which are believed in holy books) are taken from Hamurabi's law...and THAT you cannot be mistaken about, since its not an opinion and its history (history either happened or it didn't).
Wether polygamy or homosexuality (or anything else for that matter) is a social disease or not is a matter of opinion, and while you are entitled to yours, I too am entitled to mine...which only serves to reinforce why comparisons would not be possible since we are talking about a different set of definitions.
Lastly, I disagree with your point that if a person is wrong about ANY assumption you can dismiss anything they say in the future....IF you disagree with any assuptions, simply point them out and i'll be glad to discuss them with you.
But so far all i've gotten from you is that you do not believe in (at least this particular instance of) history...women were made to be screwed....and that YOUR definition of social disease is the only one that counts....WRONG on all counts!
Stay safe.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?
This is a text based medium of communication so a lot of the nuances are missed but if you want to be stricly literal then that's fine too.
You said Hamurabi was a joke and never explained what you were laughing about...so its up for interpretation.
I also never said GOD took Hamurabi's laws (in fact I don't beleive in god)...your ASSUMPTIONS in this matter are clearly wrong...I said the Ten commandements (which are believed in holy books) are taken from Hamurabi's law...and THAT you cannot be mistaken about, since its not an opinion and its history (history either happened or it didn't).
Wether polygamy or homosexuality (or anything else for that matter) is a social disease or not is a matter of opinion, and while you are entitled to yours, I too am entitled to mine...which only serves to reinforce why comparisons would not be possible since we are talking about a different set of definitions.
Lastly, I disagree with your point that if a person is wrong about ANY assumption you can dismiss anything they say in the future....IF you disagree with any assuptions, simply point them out and i'll be glad to discuss them with you.
But so far all i've gotten from you is that you do not believe in (at least this particular instance of) history...women were made to be screwed....and that YOUR definition of social disease is the only one that counts....WRONG on all counts!
Stay safe.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?