I personally think you DO have the right to talk about WWII and ANY other topic you want...especially in a public forum!
As for god being the judge, well its hard to make that argument since not everyone believes in god anyway....and maybe religions all agree about gays but they don't agree about everything, so we need a better framework is all i'm saying...otherwise how can we make our unified set of rules when we each have different books we want to refrence?
Therefore if the criteria were something more universal, like the good of society and its memebers rights, we might have a better chance of coming to an agreement than god's laws don't you think?
Stay safe all.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?
I personally think you DO have the right to talk about WWII and ANY other topic you want...especially in a public forum!
As for god being the judge, well its hard to make that argument since not everyone believes in god anyway....and maybe religions all agree about gays but they don't agree about everything, so we need a better framework is all i'm saying...otherwise how can we make our unified set of rules when we each have different books we want to refrence?
Therefore if the criteria were something more universal, like the good of society and its memebers rights, we might have a better chance of coming to an agreement than god's laws don't you think?
Stay safe all.
Perfection does not exist. The question therefore, is: what level of imperfection are we willing to settle for?