I started thinking about this because I've noticed over the years here how they will often cut out love scenes in movies "ITS NOT LOVE SCENES QATAR CENSORSHIP DEPT CUTS ' ITS PURE NUDITY THAT IS VERY COMMON IN WESTERN MOVIES ' ", but they will leave (what I consider to be) horrific scenes of violence -- and that a lot of locals don't seem to have a problem letting their kids see films like this. "WHEN WESTERN PEOPLE CAN PRODUCE A MOVIE WITH THAT BRUTAL VIOLENCE INCLUDING MANY CHILD CASTS ACTING IN THE SAME MOVIE, WHAT PROBLEM SHOULD A ARAB CHILD 'VIEWER' HAVE THEN" ?
And certainly during the war in Gaza, I saw loads of very graphic pictures around on signs, etc. "THANKS TO ALJAZEERA CHANNEL FOR BROADCASTING THE TRUTH WITH PUTTING THEIR LIFE IN DANGER WHILE CNN WAS COVERING THE GOLDEN GLOBES IN HOLLYWOOD & BBC WAS EXPLORING THE BUSINESS NEWS IN ASIA" -- which was kind of disturbing to me because back in the States images like that would be considered too much. "YEAH, IN STATES IMAGES WOULD BE CONSIDERED TOO MUCH BUT DOING IT IN REALITY MIGHT NOT"
Do you think this tendency is representative of Arab culture on the whole? Is it because for many Arabs violence has unfortunately become a fact of life? "ITS NOT ARAB VIOLENCE, IT’S THE WEST ALWAYS UPTO IT, NOT TO FORGET WHAT THE BUSH DID IN IRAQ WAR (EVEN WHEN U.N. OPPOSED IT) PUTTING U.S. INTO BILLIONS OF LOAN & PARTLY RUINING THE WORLD ECONOMY THAT ALL THE WORLD IS SUFFERING PRESENTLY, ALSO WHAT ISRAEL DID IN GHAZA, KILLING BRUTALLY THOUSAND, AND YOU CALL IT ARAB VIOLENCE??????"
Do you think we in the west are a little too 'soft' on showing violence, "SOFT ?? DON’T FORGET NEWYORK IS RATED AS TOP CRIMINAL CAPITAL, LONDON HAS MOST STABBING THAN ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, YOU CALL THAT SOFT, YEAH, MAYBE STILL SOFT FOR YOU" and would do better to more honestly show the effects of war/conflict (maybe that would make people less inclined to support wars we were involved in)? "ALL THE ARAB COUNTRIES WERE AGAINST THE GHAZA WAR, AND QATAR WAS AMONG THE MAJOR ACTION TAKER AGAINST THIS, SHAME ON ISRAEL, HONESTLY THE WAR HAS STILL NOT ENDED TOTALLY."
Or is any show of violence gratuitous and simply pandering to people's emotions? "AS MY BOLD ANSWER CLEARLY INDICATE, U.S. & ISRAEL DID IT, AND WE ONLY REVEALED THE TRUTH TO PEOPLE. YOU MAKE FAKE VIOLENT MOVIES TO BOOST YOUR FILM INDUSTRY INCOME AND HAVE NO PROBLEM RELEASING IT ALL OVER THE WORLD, WHY SHOULD THE ARABS HAVE PROBLEM REVEALING THE TRUTH OF VIOLENCE FOR THE SAKE OF ALERTING AND BRINGING KNOWLEDGE TO PEOPLE WHAT IS GOING BEHIND THE COVER PAGE. DO YOU KNOW, MAJORITY OF VISITORS TO ALJAZEERA SITE DURING THE GHAZA WAR WERE FROM THE U.S. ITSELF? THEY TOO WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH YOUR COUNTRY HIDE, MOREOVER, I STILL HAVE THE PRINTS OF 16 NEWSPAPERS AROUND THE GLOBE THAT APPRECIATED ALJAZEERA FOR REVEALING THE TURTH. THEREFORE, PLEASE, YOU BEING FROM U.S., NEVER SMOKE THE PIPE OF BEING SOFT ON SEEING VIOLENCE."
I aint offending any one, but wrote what is factual, and you probably dint consider before writing your post.
SEE MY ANSWER IN "CAPS"
I started thinking about this because I've noticed over the years here how they will often cut out love scenes in movies "ITS NOT LOVE SCENES QATAR CENSORSHIP DEPT CUTS ' ITS PURE NUDITY THAT IS VERY COMMON IN WESTERN MOVIES ' ", but they will leave (what I consider to be) horrific scenes of violence -- and that a lot of locals don't seem to have a problem letting their kids see films like this. "WHEN WESTERN PEOPLE CAN PRODUCE A MOVIE WITH THAT BRUTAL VIOLENCE INCLUDING MANY CHILD CASTS ACTING IN THE SAME MOVIE, WHAT PROBLEM SHOULD A ARAB CHILD 'VIEWER' HAVE THEN" ?
And certainly during the war in Gaza, I saw loads of very graphic pictures around on signs, etc. "THANKS TO ALJAZEERA CHANNEL FOR BROADCASTING THE TRUTH WITH PUTTING THEIR LIFE IN DANGER WHILE CNN WAS COVERING THE GOLDEN GLOBES IN HOLLYWOOD & BBC WAS EXPLORING THE BUSINESS NEWS IN ASIA" -- which was kind of disturbing to me because back in the States images like that would be considered too much. "YEAH, IN STATES IMAGES WOULD BE CONSIDERED TOO MUCH BUT DOING IT IN REALITY MIGHT NOT"
Do you think this tendency is representative of Arab culture on the whole? Is it because for many Arabs violence has unfortunately become a fact of life? "ITS NOT ARAB VIOLENCE, IT’S THE WEST ALWAYS UPTO IT, NOT TO FORGET WHAT THE BUSH DID IN IRAQ WAR (EVEN WHEN U.N. OPPOSED IT) PUTTING U.S. INTO BILLIONS OF LOAN & PARTLY RUINING THE WORLD ECONOMY THAT ALL THE WORLD IS SUFFERING PRESENTLY, ALSO WHAT ISRAEL DID IN GHAZA, KILLING BRUTALLY THOUSAND, AND YOU CALL IT ARAB VIOLENCE??????"
Do you think we in the west are a little too 'soft' on showing violence, "SOFT ?? DON’T FORGET NEWYORK IS RATED AS TOP CRIMINAL CAPITAL, LONDON HAS MOST STABBING THAN ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, YOU CALL THAT SOFT, YEAH, MAYBE STILL SOFT FOR YOU" and would do better to more honestly show the effects of war/conflict (maybe that would make people less inclined to support wars we were involved in)? "ALL THE ARAB COUNTRIES WERE AGAINST THE GHAZA WAR, AND QATAR WAS AMONG THE MAJOR ACTION TAKER AGAINST THIS, SHAME ON ISRAEL, HONESTLY THE WAR HAS STILL NOT ENDED TOTALLY."
Or is any show of violence gratuitous and simply pandering to people's emotions? "AS MY BOLD ANSWER CLEARLY INDICATE, U.S. & ISRAEL DID IT, AND WE ONLY REVEALED THE TRUTH TO PEOPLE. YOU MAKE FAKE VIOLENT MOVIES TO BOOST YOUR FILM INDUSTRY INCOME AND HAVE NO PROBLEM RELEASING IT ALL OVER THE WORLD, WHY SHOULD THE ARABS HAVE PROBLEM REVEALING THE TRUTH OF VIOLENCE FOR THE SAKE OF ALERTING AND BRINGING KNOWLEDGE TO PEOPLE WHAT IS GOING BEHIND THE COVER PAGE. DO YOU KNOW, MAJORITY OF VISITORS TO ALJAZEERA SITE DURING THE GHAZA WAR WERE FROM THE U.S. ITSELF? THEY TOO WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH YOUR COUNTRY HIDE, MOREOVER, I STILL HAVE THE PRINTS OF 16 NEWSPAPERS AROUND THE GLOBE THAT APPRECIATED ALJAZEERA FOR REVEALING THE TURTH. THEREFORE, PLEASE, YOU BEING FROM U.S., NEVER SMOKE THE PIPE OF BEING SOFT ON SEEING VIOLENCE."
I aint offending any one, but wrote what is factual, and you probably dint consider before writing your post.