No that was the extract. The original post (25 pages of A4) debate the origins of teh koran itself.
Despite the distinct lack of critical evaluation of the koran (for obvious reasons) there appears to be plenty of room for doubt about it being an unadulterated document.
No that was the extract. The original post (25 pages of A4) debate the origins of teh koran itself.
Despite the distinct lack of critical evaluation of the koran (for obvious reasons) there appears to be plenty of room for doubt about it being an unadulterated document.
I don't know how to post attachments in this or I would include it for you. The original text is at http://www.qatarliving.com/node/1078?page=2
but it was posted in reply to something you said so perhaps you have already read it.