Windows 7 Perfect Windows at all...
By rayzet19710 •
Last Oct. 22, 2009 Microsoft finally released to the market the windows 7 Ultimate, Home Premium & Professional. now i'm using Windows 7 ultimate 7600 version. Good for surfing internet, themes got better, animation and exploring windows. and many more.....
if you looking for the drivers compatability for Windows 7, just follow this link.
Drivers download link.
http://www.windows7buzz.com/windows-7-driver-download-link.html
Windows 7 Guide link.
http://www.windows7buzz.com/
for windows user only!!!!
"DOS Commands" I learned a lot in Win98se, next I shift to win 2000, I tried also win ME for a couple of time, most stable for me is windows XP x64.... the core operating system binaries are the same with Windows Server 2003 SP1.
in every 3 years microsoft developing a new OS, now MS celebrating 25 years old....
ME was after 98... last of the 95-98-ME breed, after that, XP came from the Windows NT-2000 lineage.
to see a server running a 64 bit version of an operating system. I don't think that you will need that for a home desktop.
I do agree, Windows ME and Vista were the worst in Microsoft's operating systems history ... Windows 95 got more stability and a better performance than Windows ME.
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. (Gautama Buddha)
The main differences between the 32-bit versions of Windows Vista and the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista relate to memory accessibility, memory management, and enhanced security features. The security features that are available in the 64-bit versions of Windows Vista include the following:
1.)Kernel Patch Protection
2.)Support for hardware-backed Data Execution Protection (DEP)
3.)Mandatory driver signing
4.)Removal of support for 32-bit drivers
5.)Removal of the 16-bit subsystem
One of the greatest advantages of using a 64-bit version of Windows Vista is the ability to access physical memory (RAM) that is above the 4-gigabyte (GB) range. This physical memory is not addressable by 32-bit versions of Windows Vista.
Depending on the version of Windows Vista that is installed, a 64-bit version of Windows Vista supports from 1 GB of RAM to more than 128 GB of RAM. The ability to address more physical memory lets Windows Vista minimize the time that is required to swap processes in and out of physical memory. Therefore, Windows Vista can manage processes more efficiently. This memory management feature helps improve the overall performance of Windows Vista.
Source:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/946765
LOL! At least every version is better than the previous one.
Vista was the new Windows ME.
Magic Dragon - Have you tried consulting?? You will be surprised. They are smarter than we can judge (of cause not all of them). I suggest you try. Moreover often you may get some good deal also.
"64-bit computing on Intel® architecture requires a computer system with a processor, chipset, BIOS, operating system, device drivers, and applications enabled for Intel® 64 architecture. Processors will not operate (including 32-bit operation) without an Intel® 64 architecture-enabled BIOS. Performance will vary depending on your hardware and software configurations. Consult with your system vendor for more information."
(Intel)
Consult your system vendor in the Sofitel. You think they'll be able to inform you? Honestly?
"If You Don't Want My Love, There's Nothing I Can Do"
(J. D. Souther)
Currently the 32/64 issue is irrelevant for most users; You only need 64-bit if you use more than 3GB of memory. Up to 3GB can be used with 32-bit.
Performance-wise, most apps are compiled as 32-bit to be able to run on both, and may be 0.1% slower on 64-bit.
Most people are in a two categories:
1- Word Processing and Web Browsing (A netbook with 1GB RAM/160GB HD is enough).
2- Gamers and Graphic Designers (Highest possible specs according to their budget, especially the graphics card)
There is an adavantage over 32-bit architecture if you do extensive multitasking or clustering (Windows High Performance Computing, for example). Even the software you use has to be ported to 64-bit. UNIX is 64-bit since the 1960s. But you don't run a supercomputer, don't you?
"If You Don't Want My Love, There's Nothing I Can Do"
(J. D. Souther)
Better use of memory
thanx bleu... then what is the purpose of 32 & 64...
joe, no.
WILL IT HELP THE PERFORMANCE IF CHANGE MY WIN7 32BIT TO 64BIT... I HAV 3GB RAM...2.26 GHZ INTEL CENTRINO 250 GB HDD
Bleu There’s a lot of differences of windows application, not only the version you mention, all windows application need to update if you’re using new windows to be compatible in the system.
rayzet, it's a fixed version of Vista. (The version number you get in "cmd" and "ver" are 6.1, Vista was 6.0)
4.0 = Windows NT 4.0 Server and Client
5.0 = Windows 2000 Server and Client
5.1 = Windows XP
6.0 = Windows 2008 server and Vista.
6.1 = Windows 7
I agree with KE we need to watch and observe, if it is good in software and hardware also netwoking activities for this new mention OS. but I think microsoft build this windows 7 to be same in windows xp performance.themes and appearance they got from vista.
salman-s, most users just use the computer for web browsing and chatting and don't really need more than 3GB, which is supported on a 32-bit OS.
The performance is great, the hardware cost is same as Windows XP ...
It's true that lots of enhancements are there, but I prefer to just watch and observe ... Can't judge it at the first release, surfing the net would not tell you really how good or bad this Version of windows is.
Check it in the Domain environment and you will see that they still need to work on that if they really want to push it through the market industry for corporation use and not only individual users.
Vista was a 32 bit based operating system and it has lot's of compatibility issues running applications, what more if you will go for a 64 bit? Good Luck with that ...
Do not dwell in the past, do not dream of the future, concentrate the mind on the present moment. (Gautama Buddha)
if your RAM is more than 2 gb its better to get an 64 bit
There's no such thing as 86bit...
86 = x86 = 486-PentiumI/II/III/4..... = 32-but
64 = x64 = 64-bit
Scaling to 128-bit cpus has nothing to do with it.
p.s. You currently don't get much of a performance boost by using your computer in 64-bit mode, so most people aren't using it. 128-bit should be the same.
windows vista home premium and ultimate consuming more memory usage than windows 7.
according to microsoft windows 7 will shift to 64bit mode & 86bit mode, unlike now i'm using 32bit windows for normal hardware specs, the bad things is microsoft planning for windows 8 for 2011 128bit mode and it requires high specs of hardware to run.....,,,,
"Abilities are not inherently Good or Evil, it's how you use them, In order to be better, you have to be different".
its a lot better than vista,,, atleast for now..no issues still ;-)