I am not Charlie.

I strongly condemn the cold blooded murder of the French journalists.
There is no one above laws.
You can't kill anyone without Judicial proceedings.
However I am not Charlie. I could never be Charlie.
I would rather be WISE, POLITE, CRITICAL and PRODUCTIVE than just being a PROVOCATIVE person.
First one has to ask, Why S/he is talking about other person or a community? Is it because
1. Of the real CHANGE I want to bring?
2. I just want to unpack my confused mind?
3. I seek attention?
I would never standby those insane barbaric terrorists who took laws in their hands, but “Charlie”, don’t you think you are hurting millions of peaceful people of the same community who live in secular democracies, accepts pluralism and living a good life socially and economically?
Is it not illogical to say they are not relevant because they ignore your unproductive ways of bringing the CHANGE?
Do you really think the terms “Freedom of Speech” and “Freedom of Expression” could be used to hurt someone , despite the fact that it helps no one.
Bringing the real CHANGE in a community is IMPOSSIBLE without the powerful tools like unselfishness and beneficence.
I can’t impose my thoughts in your mind Charlie.
When I defend your RIGHT of being YOU , at the same time, I also defend the rights of millions of peaceful people in the world living under the same umbrella of pluralism for being “THEM”.
Thus, I am not Charlie.
I would never want to be Charlie.
Then how about Charlie Chaplin?